An entrepreneurial education ecosystem's analysis, based on a case of a Brazilain public institution
DOI:
10.14211/regepe.e2018Keywords:
Entrepreneurial Education Ecosystem., Triple Helix, Entrepreneurial Universities Ranking, Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas GeraisAbstract
Purpose: to analyze the entrepreneurship education ecosystem of a Brazilian public teaching and research institution. Methodology: case study of the Federal Center for Technological Education of Minas Gerais (CEFET-MG), according to the following stages: survey in 2017, participant observation in 2018 and another survey in 2019. Findings: the analysis (which embraces the policies, structure, resources, actors and culture dimensions) indicates the configuration of the main entrepreneurship education ecosystem components and their possible consequences on the institution, thus showing the need for institutionalizing educational processes that comprise entrepreneurship in curriculum, co-curricular and research activities, as well as making available resources and structures that contribute to actors’ engagement and to the entrepreneurship culture development. Theoretical/methodological contributions: this paper advances the understanding of entrepreneurship education ecosystems, by proposing methods triangulation for the application of the framework of analysis, and contributes by analyzing a unique teaching and research institution, relevant for the complexity of its institutional design and for the orientation towards technological education. Originality/value: this paper (a) identifies possible analytical and suggestions for intervention, based on the interactions of the Triple Helix, in order to develop entrepreneurship education ecosystems, thus advancing the literature, and (b) approaches the teaching and research institution as the unit of analysis itself (and not the territory), therefore demonstrating an alternative to traditional research in entrepreneurship ecosystems. Practical implications: suggestions for decision-making on institutional policies and for increasing participation in actions in the territory are made, which can be put into practice to favor entrepreneurship education ecosystems of other institutions.
JEL CODE: O3, I2
Downloads
References
Alberti, F., Sciascia, S., & Poli, A. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: Notes on an ongoing debate. Proceedings of the Annual International Entrepreneurship Conference, Naples, Italy, 14. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fernando-Alberti-2/publication/228971736_Entrepreneurship_Education_Notes_on_an_Ongoing_Debate/links/00b495236d494817de000000/Entrepreneurship-Education-Notes-on-an-Ongoing-Debate.pdf
Audy, J. (2017). A inovação, o desenvolvimento e o papel da Universidade. Estudos Avançados, 31(90), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40142017.3190005
Babbie, E. (1999). Métodos de Pesquisa de Survey. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.
Belitski, M., & Heron, K. (2017). Expanding entrepreneurship education ecosystems, Journal of Management Development, 36(2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-06-2016-0121
Bell, D. (2006). El advenimiento de la sociedade post-industrial: un intento de prognosis social (6a. ed.). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Bischoff, K., Volkmann, C. K., & Audretsch, D. B. (2018). Stakeholder collaboration in entrepreneurship education: an analysis of the entrepreneurial ecosystems of European higher educational institutions. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 20-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9581-0
Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Profissional e Tecnológica. (2020). Plataforma Nilo Peçanha. Recuperado de https://www.plataformanilopecanha.org
Brasil Júnior – Confederação Brasileira de Empresas Juniores. (2017). Ranking de Universidades Empreendedoras 2017. Recuperado de https://universidadesempreendedoras.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ranking-2017.pdf
Brasil Júnior – Confederação Brasileira de Empresas Juniores. (2019). Ranking de Universidades Empreendedoras 2019. Recuperado de https://universidadesempreendedoras.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ranking-2019.pdf
Brush, C. G. (2014). Exploring the Concept of an Entrepreneurship Education Ecosystem. In S. Hoskinson & D. F. Kuratko (Eds.), Innovative Pathways for University Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century: Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth (Vol. 24, pp. 25-39). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1048-473620140000024000
Castells, M. (1999). A sociedade em rede. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e mistos (3a. ed.). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Davari, A., Emami, A., Ramadani, V., & Taherkhani, S. (2018). Factors influencing academic entrepreneurship: a case-based study, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 9(3), 284-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-01-2018-0007
Decreto nº 9.283, de 7 fevereiro de 2018. (2018). Regulamenta a Lei nº 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004, a Lei nº 13.243, de 11 de janeiro de 2016 [...]. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/decreto/D9283.htm
Distrito. (2020). Minas Tech Report Brasil 2020. São Paulo: Distrito/KPMG. Recuperado de https://materiais.distrito.me/dataminer-minas
Dorion, E. C. H., Nodari, C. H., Olea, P. M., Ganzer, P. P., & Mello, C. B. C. (2015). New Perspectives in Entrepreneurship Education – A Brazilian Viewpoint. In C. Sanchez (Ed.), Entrepreneurship Education and Training. London: InTech. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292154911_New_Perspectives_in_Entrepreneurship_Education_A_Brazilian_Viewpoint
Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial Scientists and Entrepreneurial Universities in American Academic Science. Minerva, 21(2), 198-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01097964
Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2017). Hélice Tríplice: inovação e empreendedorismo universidade-indústria-governo. Estudos Avançados, 31(90), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40142017.3190003
Fetters, M. L., Rice, M. P., Greene, P. G., & Butler, J. S. (2010). The development of university-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: Global practices. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gimenez, A. M. N. (2017). As multifaces da relação universidade-sociedade e a construção do conceito de terceira missão (Tese de doutorado). Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brasil. Recuperado de http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/324319
Godoi, C., Bandeira-de-Melo, R, & Silva, A. (2010). Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais (2a. ed.). São Paulo: Saraiva.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 43-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9171-x
Hayter, C. S. (2016). A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 633-656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9756-3
IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2020). Pesquisa de Inovação 2017. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
Isenberg, D. J. (2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurships. The Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project, 1(781), 1-13. Recuperado de http://www.innovationamerica.us/images/stories/2011/The-entrepreneurship-ecosystem-strategy-for-economic-growth-policy-20110620183915.pdf
Johann, D. A., Krüger, C., & Minello, I. F. (2018). Educação empreendedora: um estudo bibliométrico sobre a produção científica recente. Navus: Revista de Gestão e Tecnologia, 8(4), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.22279/navus.2018.v8n4.p125-145.722
Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 229(5), 577-598. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6520.2005.00099.x
Lei nº 11.892, de 29 de dezembro de 2008. (2008). Institui a Rede Federal de Educação Profissional, Científica e Tecnológica, cria os Institutos Federais de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia, e dá outras providências. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2008/lei/l11892.htm
Lei nº 13.243, de 11 de janeiro de 2016. Dispõe sobre estímulos ao desenvolvimento científico, à pesquisa, à capacitação científica e tecnológica e à inovação e altera a Lei nº 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004 [...]. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015-2018/2016/Lei/L13243.htm
Lima, E., Lopes, R. M., Nassif, V., & Silva, D. da. (2015). Opportunities to improve entrepreneurship education: Contributions considering Brazilian challenges. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1033-1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12110
Maritz, A., & Foley, D. (2018). Expanding Australian Indigenous entrepreneurship education ecosystems. Administrative Sciences, 8(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020020
Martins, I. M., & Olave, M. E. L. O. (2020). Os ‘Ecossistemas’ na área das Ciências Sociais: tipologias e particularidades. In Anais do Encontro da Anpad. On-line, 44. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346571848_Os_Ecossistemas_na_area_das_Ciencias_Sociais_tipologias_e_particularidades
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2005). Universities in National Innovation Systems. In J. Fagerberg et al. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp.1-25). New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Mukesh H. V., & Pillai, R. (2020). Role of Institutional Ecosystem in Entrepreneurship Education: An Empirical Reiteration. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 29(1), 176-205. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0971355719893521
Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277-299. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026
Neck, H. M., Greene, P. G., & Brush, C. G. (2014). Teaching entrepreneurship: A practice-based approach. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Plano de Desenvolvimento Institucional – PDI 2016-2020 (2016). Belo Horizonte: CEFET-MG. Recuperado de https://www.avaliacao.cefetmg.br/pdi/
Ratten, V. (2019). Guest editorial. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(4), 857-860. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2019-124
Relatório de Gestão de 2019. (2020). Belo Horizonte: CEFET-MG. Recuperado de https://www.cefetmg.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Relatorio_Gestao_2019_2020.pdf
Resolução CD-027/18, de 7 de maio de 2018. (2018). Aprova a Política de Inovação do Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais. Recuperado de http://www.conselhodiretor.cefetmg.br/galerias/Arquivos_ConDir/Resolucoes/Resolucoes_2018/RES_CD_027_18.htm
Ribeiro, A. T. V. B., & Plonski, G. A. (2020). Educação Empreendedora: o que dizem os artigos mais relevantes? Proposição de uma revisão de literatura e panorama de pesquisa. Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 9(1), 10-41. https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v9i1.1633
Ribeiro, A. T. V. B., Uechi, J. N., & Plonski, G. A (2018). Building builders: ntrepreneurship education from an ecosystem perspective at MIT. Triple Helix, 5(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-018-0051-y
Rossano-Rivero, S., & Wakkee, I. (2019). Academic entrepreneurship in the context of education: The role of the networking behaviour of academics. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(4), 951-974. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2018-0034
Ruffoni, J., Melo, A., & Spricigo, G. (2021). Universidade: trajetória e papel no progresso tecnológico. In M. S. Rapini, J. Ruffoni, L. A. Silva, & E. M. Albuquerque, Economia da ciência, tecnologia e inovação: fundamentos teóricos e a economia global (2ª ed.). Belo Horizonte: FACE/UFMG. Recuperado de https://www.cedeplar.ufmg.br/component/phocadownload/category/157-colecao-populacao-economia?download=1354:economia-da-ciencia-tecnologia-e-inovacao-fundamentos-teoricos-e-a-economia-global
Sebrae/MG – Serviço de Apoio às Micro e Pequenas Empresas de Minas Gerais (2018). Oficina Ecossistema de Educação Empreendedora. Belo Horizonte: Sebrae/MG.
Silva, S. A. (2017). Condicionantes para a criação de vantagens competitivas em incubadoras de empresas de base tecnológica: análise a partir da Resource-based View e da abordagem das Capacidades Dinâmicas (Tese de doutorado). CEPEAD, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-ASUESY
Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/Fetap.12167
Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems. In R. Blackburn, D. de Clercq, & J. Heinonen (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Entrepreneurship and Small Business. London: Sage.
Wraae, B., & Thomsen, J. (2019). Introducing a New Framework for Understanding Learning in an Entrepreneurship Education Ecosystem. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 19(2), 170-184. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328451887_Introducing_a_New_Framework_for_Understanding_Learning_in_an_Entrepreneurship_Education_Ecosystem
Yin, R. K. (2005). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos (3a. ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Downloads
Published
Métricas
Visualizações do artigo: 959 PDF (Português (Brasil)) downloads: 183 PDF downloads: 88
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Daniel Paulino Teixeira Lopes, Silvana Alves da Silva, Cacilda Maria de Almeida, Lucas Gabriel Ribeiro Martins
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
-
The author(s) authorize the publication of the text in the journal;
-
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas, and concepts expressed in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of their authors;
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work published under the CC BY 4.0
License, which allows sharing the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; -
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work (Submitted version, Accepted version [Manuscript accepted by the author], or Published version [Record version]) online, for example in institutional repositories or preprints, as it can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. REGEPE requires that authors indicate/link the published article with DOI. See the Effect of Open Access.
