The Governance of Interorganizational Networks: An Analysis of the Tension Between Efficiency and Inclusiveness in the Decision-Making Process
DOI:
10.14211/regepe.v8i2.1137Keywords:
Interorganizational Networks, Network Governance, Governance TensionsAbstract
Objective: To analyze how the critical contingency factors of interorganizational network governance - trust, number of members, goal consensus and network level competency needs - described by Provan and Kenis (2008), influence the tension between decision-making process and inclusion of decision-makers.
Method: The research followed a qualitative approach based on multiple case studies in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Data were collected through interviews, documentary analysis and observation.
Originality / Relevance: The research contributes to the discussion about the role of critical contingency factors and their relationship with the tension between efficiency and inclusion in the decision-making process of networks. The originality of the study refers to the empirical evidence about the role of these factors in that tension.
Results: Results shows the role of critical contingency factors, the mechanisms used for tension management, and the identification of two additional contingency factors: trust in network management and the geographical dispersion of its members.
Theoretical / methodological contributions: The study contributes to the literature through empirical evidence in that it shows that the critical contingency factors influence the tension between efficiency and inclusion of the decision process. In addition, it has been identified two additional factors: trust in management and geographic dispersion.
Social / management contributions: Based on the results analysis, it was identified that granting greater autonomy to the executive managers of the networks and their internal teams and valuing the moments of contact with the members to ensure participation are recommended mechanisms for the management of the studied tension.
Downloads
References
Albers, S. (2010). Configurations of alliance governance systems. Schmalenbach Business Review, v. 62, n. 3, pp. 204-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396805
Ansoff, H. I. (1977). Estratégia Empresarial; tradução de Antônio Zoratto Sanvicente. São Paulo.
Antunes, J., Balestrin, A., & Verschoore, J. (2010). Práticas de gestão de redes de cooperação. São Leopoldo: Unisinos.
Azevedo, A., Pardini, D., & Simão, G. (2015). Capital social e relacionamentos inter e intrarregionais em arranjos produtivos locais: Estudo no APL calçadista de Nova Serrana/MG. Revista de empreendedorismo e gestão de pequenas empresas, v. 4, n. 2, pp. 96-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v4i2.156
Bachmann, R., & Zaheer, A (2014). Confiança nas relações interorganizacionais. Handbook de relações interorganizacionais da Oxford. Porto Alegre: Bookman. pp. 479-498.
Balestrin, A., & Verschoore, J. (2008). Redes de Cooperação Empresarial-: Estratégias de Gestão na Nova Economia. Bookman editora.
Böhe, D. M., & Silva, K. D. (2004). O dilema de crescimento em redes de cooperação: o caso da Panimel. Redes de cooperação: uma nova organização de pequenas e médias empresas no Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: FEE, pp. 157-181.
Cao, Z., & Lumineau, F. (2015). Revisiting the interplay between contractual and relational governance: A qualitative and meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management, v. 33, pp. 15-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.009
Carvalho, J., Wegner, D. Begnis, H., & Antunes Júnior, J. (2018). A cooperação entre redes de pequenas empresas: Antecedentes, etapas e resultados da estratégia de intercooperação. Revista de empreendedorismo e gestão de pequenas empresas, v. 7, n. 1, pp. 35-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v7i1.549
Casey, D. K., & Lawless, J. S. (2011). The parable of the poisoned pork: Network governance and the 2008 Irish pork dioxin contamination. Regulation & Governance, v. 5, n. 3, pp. 333-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01113.x
Certo, S. C. (2003). Administração Moderna. 9. ed. Tradução Maria Lucia GL Rosa e Ludmilla Teixeira Lima. Revisão técnica Antonio Dermengi Rios. São Paulo: Prentice Hall.
Enqvist, J., Tengö, M., & Bodin, Ö. (2014). Citizen networks in the Garden City: Protecting urban ecosystems in rapid urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning, v. 130, pp. 24-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.007
Grandori, A., & Soda, G. (1995). Inter-firm networks: antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization studies, v. 16, n. 2, pp. 183-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600201
Jansen, A., Maehler, A., & Wegner, D. (2018). Governança cooperativa e o dilema da legitimidade: Um estudo de caso em uma cooperativa de crédito. Revista Iberoamericana de estratégia, v. 17, n. 3, pp. 61-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/ijsm.v17i3.2602
Jarrillo, J. C. (1993). Strategic networks: Creating the borderless organisation. Publisher: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209915
Markovic, J. (2017). Contingencies and organizing principles in public networks. Public Management Review, v. 19, n. 3, pp. 361-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1209237
Mintzberg, H. (2004). Ascensão e queda do planejamento estratégico. Bookman editora.
Motta, F. C. P., & Vasconcelos, I. F. G. (2009). Teoria Geral da Administração. 3. ed. São Paulo: Cengage Learning.
Moynihan, D. P. (2009). The network governance of crisis response: Case studies of incident command systems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 19, n. 4, pp. 895–915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun033
Pereira, B. A. D., & Pedrozo, E. A. (2004). O outro lado da cooperação: Uma análise dos problemas na gestão das redes interorganizacionais. Redes de Cooperação: Uma nova organização de pequenas e médias empresas no Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: FEE, pp. 69-88.
Perrow, C. (1992) Small-firms networks. In: Nohria, N., & Eccles, R.G. Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Poole, M. S., & Van De Ven, A. H. (1989). Using Management to Build Paradox and Organization Theories. The Academy of Management Review, v. 14, n. 4, pp. 562-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308389
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 18, n. 2, pp. 229-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015
Provan, K. G., & Sydow, J. (2014). Avaliação dos relacionamentos interorganizacionais. In: Cropper, S. et al. Handbook de relações interorganizacionais da Oxford. Porto Alegre: Bookman, pp. 623-646.
Robbins, S. P. (2000) Administração: Mudanças e perspectivas. São Paulo: Saraiva.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of management review, v. 23, n. 3, pp. 393-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617
Saz-Carranza, A., & Ospina, S. M. (2010). The Behavioral Dimension of Governing Interorganizational Goal-Directed Networks--Managing the Unity-Diversity Tension. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 21, n. 2, pp. 327-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq050
Silva, A., & Parente, J. (2018). Os desafios da construção da legitimidade do empreendedor. Revista de empreendedorismo e gestão de pequenas empresas, v. 7, n. 3, pp. 190-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v7i3.1089
Vangen, S.; Huxham, C. (2010) Introducing the theory of collaborative advantage. In: Osborne, S. P. The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 163-184.
Vangen, S. (2012) Understanding, investigating and theorizing inter-organizational collaborations: a focus on paradox. BAM 2012: Management Research Revisted: Prospects for Theory and Practice, pp. 11-13 September, Cardiff, UK.
Vangen, S., & Winchester, N. (2014) Managing cultural diversity in collaborations: A focus on management tensions. Public Management Review, v. 16, n. 5, pp. 686-707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.743579
Vangen, S., Hayes, J. P., & Cornforth, C. (2015). Governing cross-sector, inter-organizational collaborations. Public Management Review, v. 17, n. 9, pp. 1237-1260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.903658
Verschoore, J. R. S. (2004) Redes de Cooperação: Uma nova organização de pequenas e médias empresas no Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: FEE.
Verschoore, J. R., Wegner, D., & Balestrin, A. (2015). The evolution of collaborative practices in small-firm networks: a qualitative analysis of four Brazilian cases. International Journal of Management Practice, v. 8, n. 2, pp. 152-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMP.2015.071691
Wegner, D., Durayski, J., & Verschoore, J. R. (2017). Governança e eficácia de redes interorganizacionais: Comparação entre iniciativas brasileiras de redes de cooperação. Desenvolvimento em Questão, v. 15, n. 41, pp. 275-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21527/2237-6453.2017.41.275-302
Wegner, D., Zarpelon, M. F., Verschoore, J. R., & Balestrin, A. (2017). Management practices of small-firm networks and the performance of member firms. Business: Theory and Practice, v. 18, p. 197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2017.021
Downloads
Published
Métricas
Visualizações do artigo: 2011 PDF (Português (Brasil)) downloads: 731
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
-
The author(s) authorize the publication of the text in the journal;
-
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas, and concepts expressed in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of their authors;
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work published under the CC BY 4.0 License, which allows sharing the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal;
-
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work (Submitted version, Accepted version [Manuscript accepted by the author], or Published version [Record version]) online, for example in institutional repositories or preprints, as it can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. REGEPE requires that authors indicate/link the published article with DOI. See the Effect of Open Access.