Uma investigação sobre os fatores direcionadores (drivers) dos relacionamentos bidirecionais de universidades e institutos públicos de pesquisa e pequenas e médias empresas brasileiras

Vanessa Criscuolo Parreiras Oliveira; Renato Garcia

doi:10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2382

Authors

Vanessa Criscuolo Parreiras Oliveira vparreiras@uol.com.br
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto, MG, Brasil
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1153-7466
Renato Garcia rcgarcia@unicamp.br
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brasil
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9739-1658

DOI:

10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2382

Keywords:

Small and medium-sized enterprises, Bidirectional relationships, Modes or channels of interaction, University-industry interaction

Abstract

Objective of the study: to investigate the drivers of the bidirectional relationships (that is, “scientific research with considerations of immediate use of results” and “scientific research without considerations of immediate use of results”) established between research groups and the small and medium-sized Brazilian enterprises (SMEs). Methodology/approach: estimation of four logistic regression models to investigate the drivers of the bidirectional relationships between research groups from the Directory of Research Groups in Brazil of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development and 1819 enterprises with up to 499 employees. Main results: the economic sector and the access to public funding are able to influence the establishment of the bidirectional relationships between research groups and SMEs. Some specificities of the drivers of the bidirectional relationships are identified in different size ranges of SMEs. Theoretical/methodological contributions: adoption of a comprehensive database on collaboration between research groups and SMEs, based on informations from the Directory of Research Groups and the Annual Report of Social Information, and an approach to a theme that is insufficiently adressed in the literature. Relevance/originality: the assessment of how different categories of drivers influence the establishment of the bidirectional relationships between research groups and SMEs and the characterization of the drivers of these relationships in different size ranges of interactive enterprises. Social/Management Contributions: Innovation policy should address the factors that drive knowledge-related cooperation between public research organizations and SMEs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Translations of this article

Investigating the factors driving bidirectional relationships between universities and public research institutes, and Brazilian small and medium-sized enterprises (English)

References

Arroio, A., Scerri, M, (2014). Small fish in a big pond. In A. Arroio & M. Scerri (Eds.), SME and innovation in BRICS countries. the promise of small and medium enterprises. (pp. p. 1-35). Routledge, International Development Research Centre.

Arundel, A., Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative european firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 13(6), 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859092000234311

Arvanitis, S., Sydow, N., Woerter, M. (2008). Is there any impact of university–industry knowledge transfer on innovation and productivity? An empirical analysis based on swiss firm data. Review of Industrial Organization. 32(2), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-008-9164-1

Arza, V. (2010). Channels, benefits and risks of public–private interactions for knowledge transfer: conceptual framework inspired by Latin America. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X511990

Arza, V., Lopez, E. (2021). Obstacles affecting innovation in small and medium enterprises: quantitative analysis of the Argentinean manufacturing sector. Research Policy, 50(9), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104324

Arza, V., Vazquez, C. (2010). Interactions between public research organisations and industry in Argentina. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X512728

Arza, V., De Fuentes, C.; Dutrenit, G., Vazquez, C. (2015). Channels and benefits of interactions between public research organizations and industry: comparing country cases in Africa, Asia, and Latin America; In E. Albuquerque, W. Suzigan, G. Kruss & K. Lee (Eds.), Developing national systems of innovation: university–industry interactions in the Global South (pp. 164-193). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Bastos, C., Britto, J. (2017). Inovação e geração de conhecimento científico e tecnológico no Brasil: uma análise dos dados de cooperação da Pintec segundo porte e origem de capital. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 16(1), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v16i1.8649139

Bekkers, R., Freitas, I. M. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: to what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837–1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007

Britto, J., Oliveira, B. (2011) Padrões setoriais de interação universidade-empresa no Brasil: um mapeamento de competências a partir de informações da pesquisa “Brazil Survey”. Revista de Economia, 37(4), 167-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/re.v37i4.27714

Caliari, T., Rapini, M. (2017). Diferenciais da distância geográfica na interação universidade-empresa no Brasil: um foco sobre as características dos agentes e das interações. Nova Economia, 27(1), 271-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/2670

Caliari, T., Rapini, M. (2014). Um estudo sobre os determinantes da distância geográfica nas interações universidade- empresa. [XVI Seminário sobre a Economia Mineira]. Diamantina. https://diamantina.cedeplar.ufmg.br/portal/download/diamantina-2014/um-estudo-sobre-os-determinantes-da-distancia-geografica-nas-interacoes-universidade-empresa.pdf.

Chiarini, T., Oliveira, V., Rapini, M. (2020). Obstáculos à Inovação e Porte das Empresas Industriais no Brasil: rumo a políticas públicas de incentivo à inovação mais assertivas. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, 56, 41-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.38116/ppp56art2

Cohen, W., Nelson, R., Walsh, J. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.

De Fuentes, C., Dutrenit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit. Research Policy, 41(9), 1666–1682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.026

Dutrenit, G. (2010) Introduction to special issue: Interactions between public research organisations and industry in Latin America: a study on channels and benefits from the perspective of firms and researchers. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 471–472.

Fabiano, G., Marcellusi, A., Favato, G (2020). Channels and processes of knowledge transfer: How does knowledge move between university and industry? Science and Public Policy, 47(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa002

Franco, M., Haase, H. (2015). University–industry cooperation: researchers’ motivations and interaction channels. Journal of Engeenring Technology Management, 36, 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.05.002

Freitas, I., Geuna, A., Rossi, F.(2013). Finding the right partners: institutional and personal modes of governance of university–industry interactions. Research Policy, 42(1), 50– 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.007

Gilsing, V., Bekkers, R., Freitas, I. M., van der Steen, M. (2011). Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development-based industries: transfer mechanisms and barriers. Technovation, 31(12), 638–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.06.009

Jensen, R., Thursby, J., Thursby, M. C. (2010). University-industry spillovers, government funding, and industrial consulting. NBER Working Paper No. 15732. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w15732/w15732.pdf

Laursen, K., Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33(8), 1201–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004

Meyer-Krahmer, F., Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00094-8

Molina-Ycaza, D., Sanchez-Riofrio, A. (2016). Obstáculos para la micro, pequeña y mediana empresa en América Latina Revista Pymes, Innovación y Desarrollo, 4(2), 21-36.

Muscio, A. Quaglione, D., Vallianti, G. (2013). Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities? Research Policy, 42(1), 63– 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.010

Nogueira, M. (2017) Um pirilampo no porão: um pouco de luz nos dilemas da produtividade das pequenas empresas e da informalidade no Brasil. IPEA.

Oliveira, V., Garcia, R., Bacic, M. J. (2018). Fatores direcionadores da cooperação de pequenas e médias empresas com a universidade: evidências a partir de quatro estudos de caso. Economica, 20,(2), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.22409/reuff.v20i2.35040

Pinho, M. (2011). A visão das empresas sobre as relações entre universidade e empresa no Brasil: uma análise baseada nas categorias de intensidade tecnológica. Revista de Economia, 37(4), 279-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/re.v37i4.27686

Povoa, L., Rapini, M. (2010). Technology transfer from universities and public research institutes to firms in Brazil: what is transferred and how the transfer is made. Science and Public Policy, 37(2), 147-159. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X496619

Rapini, M., Oliveira, V., Calliari, T. (2016). Como a interação universidade-empresa é remunerada no Brasil: evidências dos grupos de pesquisa do CNPq. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 15(2), 219-246. https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v15i2.8649129

Rapini, M., Oliveira, V., Silva Neto, F. (2014). A natureza do financiamento influencia na interação universidade-empresa no Brasil? Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 13(1), 77-108. https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v13i1.8649072

Righi, H., Rapini, M. (2011). Metodologia e apresentação da Base de Dados do Censo 2004 do Diretório dos Grupos de Pesquisa do Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa Científica e Tecnológica (CNPq). In: W., Suzigan, E. E. Albuquerque & S. Cario (Orgs), Em busca da inovação: interação universidade-empresa no Brasil. (pp. , p. 45-73). Editora Autêntica.

Rosa, A., Ruffoni, J., Garcia, R. (2018). Capacidade de absorção e desempenho inovativo: uma análise para as firmas interativas com grupos de pesquisa universitários das áreas das engenharias do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Economia de Empresas, 18(1), 71-91.

Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M., Fröhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31(3), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00111-1

Suzigan, W., Albuquerque, E., Garcia, R., Rapini, M. (2009). University and industry linkages in Brazil: some preliminary and descriptive results. Seoul Journal of Economics, 22(4), 591-691.

Torres, A., Dutrenit, G., Sampedro, J. L., Becerra, N. (2011). What are the factors driving university–industry linkages in latecomer firms: evidence from Mexico. Science and Public Policy, 38(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X12924093660390

Zevallos, E. (2003) Micro, pequenas y medianas empresas en América Latina Revista de la Cepal,.79, 53-70.

Veugelers, R., Cassiman, B. (2005) R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, 355– 379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.01.008