Brazilian and American Entrepreneurial Experience: Cultural and Financial Aspects from Brazilian Entrepreneurs’ Point of View
DOI:
10.14211/regepe.v9i3.1403Keywords:
Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial Experience, Culture, Access to CapitalAbstract
Objective: this study aims to compare the entrepreneurial experience, specifically related to the determinants culture and access to capital between Brazil (the South and the Southeast regions) and the United States of America (South Florida), from the entrepreneur´s point of view.
Methodology: an exploratory qualitative study was developed through in-depth interviews with Brazilian entrepreneurs, who had entrepreneurial experience both in Brazil and in the US.
Results: even though the American economy and the image of entrepreneurs in the US encourage entrepreneurship, the fear of failure is present in both countries. Besides, the common belief that it is easy and cheap to get credit in the US was not verified in the interviews. Finally, the perspective of entrepreneurs in relation to the regulation in the US is also contradictory. Even though they like the regulation in the US and criticize the Brazilian bureaucracy, they also would like to have the flexibility that they have in Brazil.
Methodological and theoretical contributions: this study makes it possible to future researchers to compare the venture capital market in both countries, as the other determinants that compound the entrepreneurial ecosystem.
Originality/Relevance: this study’s relevance comes from the comprehension of the differences between the entrepreneurial experience in Brazil and in the United States, through Brazilian entrepreneurs’ experiences.
Contributions: through the entrepreneurs’ experiences, it was possible to identify how the differences between the two countries, mainly regarding cultural and financial aspects, can modify the entrepreneurial ecosystem.
Downloads
References
Agência Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Industrial. (2011). A Indústria de private equity e venture capital: segundo censo brasileiro. São Paulo.
Ahmad, N. & Hoffman, A. (2008). A framework for addressing and measuring entrepreneurship, OECD Statistics Working Paper, No° 2008/02. Recuperado em 19 outubro, 2018, de http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/243160627270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/243160627270
Almeida, F. de, Valadares, J., & Sediyama, G. (2017). A Contribuição do Empreendedorismo para o Crescimento Econômico dos Estados Brasileiros. REGEPE - Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 6(3), 466-494. Recuperado em 18 outubro, 2018, de https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v6i3.552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v6i3.552
Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs. (2013). Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Diagnostic Toolkit. Recuperado em 19 outubro, 2018, de https://assets.aspeninstitute.org/content/uploads/files/content/docs/pubs/FINAL%20Ecosystem%20Toolkit%20Draft_print%20version.pdf
Bardin, L. (2010). Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70.
Belk, R., Fischer, E., & Kozinets, R. (2013). Qualitative consumer & marketing research. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Bosma, N., Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., Coduras, A. & Levie, J. (2009), Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2008 Executive Report. Babson Park, MA, USA: Babson College, Santiago, Chile: Universidad del Desarollo. UK: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
Confederação Nacional da Indústria & Great Britain. (2015). Os Mercados Brasileiro e Britânico de Financiamento Para Pequenas e Médias Empresas: Principais alternativas de cada país e os desafios para o desenvolvimento do mercado brasileiro. Brasília.
Coviello, N., & Yli-Renko, H. (2016). Handbook of Measures for International Entrepreneurship Research: Multi-Item Scales Crossing Disciplines and Contexts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784711405
Danjou, I. (2002). L’entrepreneuriat: un champ fertile à la recherche de son unité. Revue Française de Gestion, 28(138), 109-125.
Duarte, J., & Barros, A. (2006). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa em comunicação (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Endeavor Brasil. (2017). Índice de Cidades Empreendedoras Brasil 2017. Recuperado em 19 outubro, 2018, de https://info.endeavor.org.br/ice2017
Endeavor Brasil & Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2011). Estatísticas de empreendedorismo. Recuperado em 19 outubro, 2018, de ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Estatisticas_de_Empreendedorismo/2011/empreendedorismo2011.pdf
Endeavor Brasil & META. (2015). Cultura Empreendedora no Brasil: o potencial para empreender com Alto Impacto. Recuperado em 19 outubro, 2018, de https://info.endeavor.org.br/culturaempreendedoranobrasil
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2017a). United States Report 2016. Babson, MA, EUA: Babson College.
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2017b). Empreendedorismo no Brasil 2016. IBPQ, Curitiba.
Henrekson, M., Johansson, D. (2008). Competencies and Institutions Fostering High-Growth Firms. Foundations Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5 (1), 1-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000026
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
Isenberg, D. (2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. The Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project. Babson College, Massachusetts. Recuperado em 18 outubro, 2018, de http://entrepreneurial-revolution.com/2011/05/11/the-entrepreneurship-ecosystem-strategy-as-a-new-paradigm-for-economic-policy-principles-for-cultivating-entrepreneurship/
KPMG & Associação Brasileira de Private Equity & Venture Capital. (2016). Consolidação de Dados Indústria de Private Equity e Venture Capital no Brasil. Recuperado em 19 outubro, 2018, de https://www.abvcap.com.br/Download/Estudos/3899.pdf
Krueger, Jr., N., & Brazeal, D. (2018). Potencial Empreendedor e Empreendedores em Potencial. REGEPE - Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 7(2), 201-226. Recuperado em 22 outubro, 2018, de https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v7i2.1071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v7i2.1071
Ramalho, C., Furtado, C. V. (Org.) & Lara, R. (Org.). (2011). Introdução ao Private Equity e Venture Capital para Empreendedores. São Paulo, FGV. Recuperado em 22 outubro, 2018, de http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/8421
Sarfati, Gilberto. (2013). Estágios de desenvolvimento econômico e políticas públicas de empreendedorismo e de micro, pequenas e médias empresas (MPMEs) em perspectiva comparada: os casos do Brasil, do Canadá, do Chile, da Irlanda e da Itália [Versão Eletrônica], Revista de Administração Pública, 47(1), 25-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122013000100002
Schumpeter, J.A. (1949). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. Pennsylvania State University: Harvard University.
U.S. News & World Report. (2017). Best Countries 2017 Global rankings, international news and data insights. Recuperado em 19 outubro, 2018, de https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/entrepreneurship
Downloads
Published
Métricas
Visualizações do artigo: 567 PDF (Português (Brasil)) downloads: 389 PDF downloads: 123
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
-
The author(s) authorize the publication of the text in the journal;
-
The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas, and concepts expressed in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of their authors;
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work published under the CC BY 4.0
License, which allows sharing the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; -
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work (Submitted version, Accepted version [Manuscript accepted by the author], or Published version [Record version]) online, for example in institutional repositories or preprints, as it can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. REGEPE requires that authors indicate/link the published article with DOI. See the Effect of Open Access.
